In order to vote in liberty, one must recognize harmonies, if in a collective meditation this also applies, the speaker says something, that is a guide for any who does not know -what to do independently- to follow along with.
If the speaker says an attribute, you feel it is not the only one, or perhaps sufficient or appropriate to yourself, use different words -rather than internalizing a droning repetition- if you disagree then add a constructive criticism, short and in harmony, each utilizing silence.
In this way one elects their role in the play, the speaker asks for light to flood the assembly: one shouts an emphatic yes internally, imagining it radiating to each; one shouts yes or claps their hands out loud; one feels the internal vibrations, imagining them running through each individual; one rubs their hands vigorously, to feel the heat as a relatively subtle sense; one breathes in deeply, feeling their heart or pulsing wrists; one visualizes light surrounding the group.
If one is to vote with their taxes, they must have the basic guideline, it is only there for those who do not know what to do (such a governing entity would however find use, of a different kind in banks -in financial advisors- all careers are intensive functions) the election is never free in an airy sense, true election has a root and one guides, but the liberty comes from lacking obligation.
One provides their own focus, the other elects their course in the political environment, that environment is not deterministic.