Esoteric Online

Caleb Grayson
  • Male
  • Haiku, HI
  • United States
Share on Facebook

Caleb Grayson's Friends

  • Lj
  • Lightdragon
  • Trevor W. G.
  • Paul Bartscher
  • Kris
  • Fire Lotus
  • steve
  • ☤Tris☤

Caleb Grayson's Page

Latest Activity

Caleb Grayson liked ☤Tris☤'s blog post Actuality and Reality
May 11, 2020

Caleb Grayson liked ☤Tris☤'s blog post Actuality and Reality
May 11, 2020

Caleb Grayson commented on ☤Tris☤'s blog post Actuality and Reality
"i’ve always thought of God’s realization as Reality via omniscience. also, all of materiality is conscious and thus creates a common reality. i’m not sure i can buy into non-actual realization. it seems that all realization but…"
May 11, 2020

Profile Information

What brings you to Esoteric Online?
Elemental Theory
-i'm working on an Elemental Cosmology.
Current Path
Favorite Sacred Sciences
About Me
i've spent the last 15 years "reverse engineering" astrology.
i've found the 4 elements to be roots of astrology and then redefine the rest of astrology from those roots. the signs, houses, planets, and aspects are all related back to the elements.
the 4 elements are rooted in the I Ching's dynamic/static yang/yin.
i've also been developing a process metaphysics based in the elements similar to Whitehead.
i just graduated from CIIS with an MA in Philosophy, Cosmology, and Consciousness.
i've struggled with my Christianity and have in the past modified it with the following words:
neo-Edonic, Post-Modern Fundamentalist, Hedonist, Esoteric, Libertarian, Anarchist, Baptist

i'm working on on using Elemental Theory like Ken Wilber uses Integral Theory, a way to do astrology without astrological terms or direct connection to the planets.

i love collaboration and insight. i have intuitions into the esoteric truths, but read very little. i'm interested in meeting people who've read a lot and perhaps can offer me clues and keys for further unlocking the mysteries.
Astrological Sign
No. 8
Favorite Books
Process Astrology - Rudhyar
Favorite Films

Caleb Grayson's Blog

Art vs Science — An Elemental Perspective

Posted on December 14, 2013 at 1:06pm 0 Comments

(re:posted from ElementalCosmos)
I have been thinking a lot about the limits of Science.  I have this diagram that may be helpful.  I’ve taken the
Jungian personality types and have used them as categories to ‘separate’ out the for lack of a better phrase “Art vs…

Comment Wall (7 comments)

You need to be a member of Esoteric Online to add comments!

Join Esoteric Online

At 8:21am on July 10, 2018, neophyte said…

Hi Caleb,

Yesterday i forgot to mention the 22 and 26 connections of the Hebrew and Greek ( 22 chars/values) alphabets/gematria as well as our own 26 char (13 x 2) alphabet. 22 must have some meaning as the original Old Testament/Jewish bible has 22 books in it before another 17 were added to make the current Christian 39 books (possibly more in a Catholic bible as they have 70 books in total while most other versions have 66. (22 x 3)

I have been considering the geometry of the Cuboctahedron - a structure i consider fundamental to Universal structure on all levels in our current base dimensionality which is comprised of 13 vertices (12 outer plus the 1 central core point)  a structure that has 24 outer 'edges'. (There are 6 of them visible in my 3D logo). :-)

Make of what you will of the following sequence that compression and R-evolution of this structure initiated:

24 x 1/2 = 12 12 (24)

12 12 x 1/3 = 8 8 8 (24)

8 8 8 x 1/4 = 6 6 6 6 (24)

6 6 6 6 x 1/3 = 4 4 4 4 4 4 (24)

4 4 4 4 4 4 x 1/4 = 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 (24)

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 x 1/3 = 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 (24)

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 x 1/2 = 1 1 1 1...            ... 1 1 (24)

From one 24 bond spherical structure down to 24 one bond structures takes 8 steps using the sequence of 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/3, 1/4, 1/3,1/2 (7 'compressions') from the O riginal state.

By compressions i mean a spherical object with 24 vertices with 'single' strength bonds between their immediate neighbours are compressed into 12 double bond connections ( compare a C-C bond in chemistry with a C=C bond and a C=_C ( three bond) ) then down to 8 triple bonds etc down to a single 24 bond connection with 'itself'.

I derived this math sequence after watching a you tube video of Buckminster Fuller demonstrating part of the concept to students with a physical model (don't have the link to hand) but he calls the Cuboctahedron the Vector Equilibrium.

Cheers, Neophyte.

At 4:48am on July 9, 2018, neophyte said…

Hi Caleb,

with regard to your recent comment on Tris's Triplicities post:

I've been investigating similar concepts and would offer the following for your list:

92 - the number of naturally occuring elements in our Universe, #92 being Uranium.

60 - the number of seconds per minute/minutes per hour/degree or the base of the Babylonian and Sumerian number systems. Also the number of carbon atoms in a molecule of buckminsterfullerene.

At 4:11am on March 1, 2013, philip harding said…

Hi Caleb,your observations are most helpful and very much appreciated,I designed the glyph,symbol when in a purely logical questioning mode of thought,whilst  trying to answer the ultimate question of why we are all here,I had no intention of making a symbol using the word love.

My starting point was basic mathematical symbols,arranged along a dividing line,it was literally a revelation when I saw the word love appear as the answer.

Have you seen the other variations of the symbol? if not I would very much like value your observations.

In friendship


At 4:41am on February 28, 2013, philip harding said…

Hi Caleb,Sorry for the delay,and thanks for the welcome.

At 7:23pm on December 29, 2012, Denisa Šmid said…

Welcome to the neoplatonist group that investigates the work and life of this chief of the Rosicrucians.

At 3:04am on August 7, 2012, Trevor W. G. said…

Hello my friend... I just read your profile...interesting. Anyway I too have the intuition without reading much pf anything actually. I skim and contemplate. I am also highly interested in developing an elemental theory, but realized their were likely others who could do it better. Perhaps you are one? either way I would like to hear of your most fundamental concepts which construct the core of your theory. Please message me or otherwise explain in simple refined terms the essence of your theory, at you leisure of course.

At 9:15am on February 2, 2012, Fire Lotus said…

Thank you for touching base with me. i will gladly take any advice or direction to improve my knowledge and understanding of these arts and sciences. i am affiliated w a few different groups so i stay very busy and do not always have the chance to come on here as i used to. so please feel free to contact me and do not fret if it takes some time for me to respond i am definately interested.

much love and light to you and yours



© 2021   Created by The Community.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service